Rob, Rambling - A lot of things interest me...

Kickass! Gawker used one of my tips for a story!

See the bit about Channel 4 News in the middle of this article? That tipster is me!

To be absolutely fair to Channel 4 News, it definitely is the best TV news in Britain, by a long, long way. And it is unfortunately having its budget slimmed, resulting in the axing of a couple of its bulletins.

Their Twitter feed is usually pretty good, but they have a tendency to crowd-source. A lot. Probably their worst mistake is to constantly say things like “We have so-and-so on tonight. What should we ask him? Send your Qs to…”.

Hopefully this is just constructive criticism, because C4 News is genuinely a good news show, and they’re making an effort to use new technology as further means of communication.

Fucking hell, even Gawker is parroting this Demi Moore/Sarah Brown twitter nonsense now.

Is there seriously such pressure on to get stories published that research just doesn’t happen in modern journalism? I’m at work myself (admittedly on a slow day), but I had time to look up the source of this story and was able to check the facts. It’s really not that fucking difficult.

Sorry, but this genuinely annoys me. It’s not the whole old/new media thing, nor is it about Twitter.

It’s about sheer fucking laziness on the part of journalists who would rather repeat something almost verbatim than bother to go and check the fucking facts them-fucking-selves.

It’s about the rush to get something out there so that people see it, and see the surrounding adverts, rather than making sure that something is true, or accurate. It’s about not wanting to be left behind or usurped by a rival.

It’s about the race to the bottom in terms of journalism, wanting everything faster and cheaper, and the accuracy of the “news” can simply go fuck itself.

And it’s really, really fucking depressing.

I got a Gawker star, I got a Gawker star!!! And on the new commenting system, no less. These things are like gold(star)dust. And mine came from the man Denton himself, the dark overlord of Gawker.

I’ve literally commented on Gawker less than 5 times, even though I read it every day. A lot of it is too US-centric for me to have a really informed opinion, and I’m not quick-witted enough to be sufficiently snarky.

But when it comes to British media, and especially British media scandals, I know my shit, and can contribute.

I’ve been following this story for a couple of years, since the reporter got jailed and the editor resigned. It’s one of those commonly known “facts” that it wasn’t just a one-off, and I’m pretty certain I read at the time a table of how often each major newspaper had employed this private investigator to do some “research” for them.

Then it kind of got forgotten for a while, until Nick Davies at The Guardian somehow managed to get hold of some details of these gagging orders and out of court settlements. The paper splashed on it today, and by the looks of the website it’ll be doing so again tomorrow.

The problem is that the editor in question has since become the head of PR for the Tory party, so it’s being massively spun by Labour as a political issue, especially since their own head of PR got caught doing some very naughty things recently, and had to resign in disgrace. Damien McBride is his name, and it was a pretty big scandal.

But by spinning it in this way, and making it a party political issue (should he be fired, how could you hire such a man, etc), it’s detracting from the real story which is massively underhand and illegal journalism, without so much as a shred of a public interest defence.

One of the celebs that had their voicemail hacked was Gwyneth Paltrow, a week after giving birth to one of her oddly-named kids. Seriously, where the hell is there a public interest in getting stories in this manner?!

It reminds me of a line that went something like “What is of interest to the public is not always of public interest”.

Anyways, I got a Gawker star, la-la-la!

I got a Gawker star, I got a Gawker star!!! And on the new commenting system, no less. These things are like gold(star)dust. And mine came from the man Denton himself, the dark overlord of Gawker.

I’ve literally commented on Gawker less than 5 times, even though I read it every day. A lot of it is too US-centric for me to have a really informed opinion, and I’m not quick-witted enough to be sufficiently snarky.

But when it comes to British media, and especially British media scandals, I know my shit, and can contribute.

I’ve been following this story for a couple of years, since the reporter got jailed and the editor resigned. It’s one of those commonly known “facts” that it wasn’t just a one-off, and I’m pretty certain I read at the time a table of how often each major newspaper had employed this private investigator to do some “research” for them.

Then it kind of got forgotten for a while, until Nick Davies at The Guardian somehow managed to get hold of some details of these gagging orders and out of court settlements. The paper splashed on it today, and by the looks of the website it’ll be doing so again tomorrow.

The problem is that the editor in question has since become the head of PR for the Tory party, so it’s being massively spun by Labour as a political issue, especially since their own head of PR got caught doing some very naughty things recently, and had to resign in disgrace. Damien McBride is his name, and it was a pretty big scandal.

But by spinning it in this way, and making it a party political issue (should he be fired, how could you hire such a man, etc), it’s detracting from the real story which is massively underhand and illegal journalism, without so much as a shred of a public interest defence.

One of the celebs that had their voicemail hacked was Gwyneth Paltrow, a week after giving birth to one of her oddly-named kids. Seriously, where the hell is there a public interest in getting stories in this manner?!

It reminds me of a line that went something like “What is of interest to the public is not always of public interest”.

Anyways, I got a Gawker star, la-la-la!

Like it or not, humans are just wired to process things visually. You can say a protester was shot in the chest, and we can all understand the consequences and feel bad about it. We can even say that logically, this death shouldn’t mean more than the thousands who’ve died elsewhere under similar circumstances just because it was recorded on video. But the reality is that only when confronted with powerful visual imagery are most people truly able to empathize and fully understand the moment and its depth.

We’re programmed this way. Human culture and communication for thousands of years has been set up almost entirely around visual portrayals in order to bring across points and events in the most effective way possible. From cave drawings to hieroglyphics to Greco-Roman sculpture and art to Medieval tapestries to the Sistine Chapel and onwards to today, we communicate most effectively through pictures.

You can describe a man standing in front of a column of tanks in Tienanmen Square, but without the picture, the impact and poignancy of the moment would have been lost. You can talk about a Vietnamese girl running naked and terrified from her village as its napalmed, but the picture is what communicates the true horror of her circumstance. Likewise, we all can probably imagine a young woman getting shot in the chest by totalitarian police forces, but only through the video is a face assigned to the act, and the true terror, desperation and hopelessness brought across to the viewer. And in this, not only does the single death find more meaning than had it not been recorded, but it also brings greater meaning to all the other deaths that have been reported in these protests which don’t have dramatic videos. I can only speak for myself when I say that from this point forward every time I hear of another protester being killed, my mind no longer simply dismiss it as a sad statistic, but rather will come back to the images of Neda slowly dying in the street, and imagine what hell those others must have endured also. And if others feel the same way, then yes, this video is meaningful and worthwhile indeed.

Comment by Thomas Paladino on a post on Gawker about the shot Iranian protestor Neda, in response to another comment questioning why her death matters more than the other 150 protestors, or even the 300,000 killed by the tsunami a few years ago.

Simply fantastic. I wish I could write this intelligently and eloquently.

About

Londoner, thinking and writing far too much about far too many random things. Wannabe photo-/videographer of my life. More likely to be found propping up a bar somewhere.

I also write about football.

This mess is powered by Tumblr, on which there are many things I like. You can also ask me anything.

RSS | Archives | Random

Contact

Twitter

Tags

Type: text, photo, photoset, picture, video, audio, link, quote, chat, reblog, question, ask me anything
Style: ranting, random, happy, funny, cynicism, meme, review, rambling, list
Self: self reference, self portrait, self made, self mocking, self flattery, self confidence, introspection, gpoyw
People:
girlfriend, family, sister, parents, friends, relationships, ex, housemates
Happenings: drinking, work, party, bed talk, sleep, sex, travel, holiday
Culture: internet, music, food, twitter, films, books, comedy, tv, news,
Subjects: london, money, media, newspapers, drugs, celebs, politics,
Sport: sport, football, arsenal, rugby, athletics, gym, exercise
Random: dirty old man, swearing,
Meta: tumblr, tumbling about tumbling, tumblr crush, blogging, tumblr people